Navigating CAD Product Data Management Challenges

CAD Product Data Management

A number of Cognidox companies use the tool to store their 2D and 3D CADdrawings, in addition to more typical Office files.

In general this is not a cheap or smooth process for them. Drawings are made from parts or components and there are typically a large number of assembly parts/number of alignments of expensive high-precision parts. It usually takes a few months to complete a typical drawing and therefore they can each represent around an $30K investment. Supplier lists can stretch to more than 200 various suppliers located throughout the world. The most used widely CAD software packages we see are SolidWorks, AutoCAD, and PTC Creo.


  • Autodesk Vault 23%
  • Windchill 14%
  • Autodesk PLM360 14%
  • Teamcenter 13%
  • ENOVIA 6%
  • Omnify 1%

There are free, open-source tools such as FreeCAD and LibreCAD available, but we don't see them used that much. However, with growth drivers such as the Internet of things (IoT) and Building Information Modeling (BIM), there is no reason to suspect any slowdown in this usage.

Recently, surveyed 151 product development professionals about how they manage this product data. They graded their company's performance on this, and the problems they encounter may sound familiar.

  • Missing steps in the release process
  • Encountering late-stage design changes that require rework
  • Failing to get input from necessary collaborators
  • Ordering wrong parts
  • Working from the wrong version of documents

Poor quality performers reported the wrong version pitfall as happening “Often or All the time”. Only around half the surveyed companies used tools to mitigate these problems. These tools may be 3rd party (and expensive) add-ons from the CAD vendors but we also often see re-purposed open-source version control system tools such as Apache Subversion (SVN). There are overlapping requirements such as file check-in/check-out. Usability is often very poor. Either way, it is not a successful strategy.

Value of DMS for Product Development

Tags: Product Management, Fabless Semiconductor Design, Company News

Paul Walsh

Written by Paul Walsh

Paul Walsh was one of the founders of Cognidox. After a period as an academic working in user experience (UX) research, Paul started a 25-year career in software development. He's worked for multinational telecom companies (Nortel), two $1B Cambridge companies (Ionica, Virata), and co-founded a couple of startup companies. His experience includes network management software, embedded software on silicon, enterprise software, and cloud computing.

Related Posts

The Pros and Cons of Phase Gate Processes in New Product Development

Will a phase gate process hold back or enhance your new product development? What are the pros and ...

Evolving Quality Management: From Ad Hoc to Chaordic

How can you help your business evolve its mindset to achieve the most instinctive, frictionless and ...

Maximising Customer Value Through Lean Documentation

In a Lean approach to product development, customer value is defined as ‘everything the customer is ...

The Importance of Flexible eQMS in Semiconductor Success

Chip designs are becoming more complex and expensive to develop, verify and validate. Opportunities ...

10 Reasons Fabless Semiconductor Companies Need Document Control

With complexity and costs rising, fabless semiconductor companies need to do all they can to keep ...

What happened at CogniCon24?

On the 16th of May, Cognidox welcomed nearly 100 attendees from across the high-tech, medical ...

Announcing CogniCon 24 - save the date!

The Cognidox team is delighted to announce we will be hosting CogniCon 24 on 16 May 2024. This is a ...

Cognidox announces new e-signature integration with DocuSign

Cognidox are delighted to announce the release of our new DocuSign e-signature integration. The new ...